Efficacy of retroperitoneal triple neurectomy for refractory neuropathic inguinodynia

Alexandra M Moore, Martin F Bjurstrom, Jonathan R Hiatt, Parviz K Amid, David C Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Refractory neuropathic inguinodynia following inguinal herniorrhaphy is a common and debilitating complication. This prospective study evaluated long-term outcomes associated with laparoscopic retroperitoneal triple neurectomy.

METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive patients (51 male; mean age, 47); all failing pain management; prior reoperation in 35, prior neurectomy in 26; average follow-up 681 days (range: 90 days to 3 years). Measured outcomes include numeric pain ratings, dermatomal mapping, histologic confirmation, quantitative sensory testing, complications, narcotic usage, and activity level.

RESULTS: Mean numerical pain scores were significantly decreased (baseline, 8.6) at all postoperative time points (POD 1, 3.6; P < .001: POD 90, 2.3, P < .001) with durable efficacy from POD 90 to 3 years (P < .001). Quantitative sensory testing showed marked group-level increases of sensory thresholds. Narcotic dependence decreased in 57/62 and was eliminated in 44/62 and activity level improved in 58/62.

CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneal triple neurectomy is an effective and durable treatment for refractory neuropathic inguinodynia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1126-1132
Number of pages7
JournalThe American Journal of Surgery
Volume212
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Dec
Externally publishedYes

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Surgery

Free keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Denervation
  • Female
  • Hernia, Inguinal
  • Herniorrhaphy
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neuralgia
  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Prospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult
  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of retroperitoneal triple neurectomy for refractory neuropathic inguinodynia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this