EU Climate Policy after the Crisis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In the period 2009–2011, Member States discussed whether the EU should
increase its emissions reduction target for 2020 beyond the existing 20%. This discussion has not resulted in any agreement, the different actors being deeply divided between those calling for a step-up to a higher target (for instance 30%) and those opposed to any kind of increase. The division can be seen as a result of a conflict between policy frames. The economic crisis has deepened the division between those who see climate-change policy as detrimental to growth and those seeing it as beneficial to growth. Whereas the latter group – including the UK and DG Climate Action – subscribe to the
green growth policy frame, the former – including Poland – subscribe to the ‘trade-off policy frame’. Many Member States have been internally divided between proponents and opponents of a step-up, often with environment ministries in the former camp and finance and economics ministries in the latter.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-17
JournalEnvironmental Politics
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Political Science

Free keywords

  • Climate change
  • European Union
  • policy frames
  • economic crisis
  • ecological modernisation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'EU Climate Policy after the Crisis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this