Evaluating Clusters: Where Theory Collides with Practice

Madeline Smith, James Wilson, Emily Wise

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Cluster policies are widely used to strengthen regional competitiveness, yet difficult to evaluate. While academic approaches to cluster evaluation are often ignorant of the needs of policy-makers and practitioners, practitioner-led approaches often lack structure and rigour. As such, there remain significant gaps between theory and practice. The contribution of this paper is to reflect on a unique methodological approach that has regularly brought together academics, policy-makers and practitioners from around the world to collectively address the challenges of cluster evaluation. A participatory process of integrating theory and practice highlights the importance of triple helix engagement to co-design evaluation of what is a triple helix policy proposition.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)413-430
Number of pages18
JournalRegional Science Policy and Practice
Volume12
Issue number3
Early online date2020 Apr 17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020 Jun

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Information Systems, Social aspects
  • Public Administration Studies

Free keywords

  • cluster evaluation
  • cluster policy
  • clusters
  • practitioner involvement
  • Triple helix

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating Clusters: Where Theory Collides with Practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this