Abstract
Cluster policies are widely used to strengthen regional competitiveness, yet difficult to evaluate. While academic approaches to cluster evaluation are often ignorant of the needs of policy-makers and practitioners, practitioner-led approaches often lack structure and rigour. As such, there remain significant gaps between theory and practice. The contribution of this paper is to reflect on a unique methodological approach that has regularly brought together academics, policy-makers and practitioners from around the world to collectively address the challenges of cluster evaluation. A participatory process of integrating theory and practice highlights the importance of triple helix engagement to co-design evaluation of what is a triple helix policy proposition.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 413-430 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Regional Science Policy and Practice |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 2020 Apr 17 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 Jun |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Information Systems, Social aspects (including Human Aspects of ICT)
- Public Administration Studies
Free keywords
- cluster evaluation
- cluster policy
- clusters
- practitioner involvement
- Triple helix
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating Clusters: Where Theory Collides with Practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver