Eve and the serpent: A rational choice to err

Sidney Dekker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In dealing with inexplicable disaster, like the untimely death of a child in a hospital, we increasingly turn to the justice system for accountability and retribution. While seemingly sensible, criminalizing human error has a range of negative consequences. But it does offer "good" narratives of failure as the result of human fault-even at the cost of guilt. Such narratives allow us to pinpoint a cause: people made a rational choice to err and should be punished. This allows us to imagine ourselves in control over random, meaningless events. This paper traces Judeo-Christian roots of such regulative ideals in Western moral thinking, by examining the Genesis account of Eve and the Serpent, and St. Augustine's interpretation of it.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)571-579
JournalJournal of Religion and Health
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Other Engineering and Technologies

Free keywords

  • human error
  • eve
  • sin
  • serpent

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Eve and the serpent: A rational choice to err'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this