Research output per year
Research output per year
Abstract
I AM GRATEFUL TO Dien Ho and James Phillips for their comments on my article (Mulinari, 2018). Although they approach the topic from different perspectives, they both seem to find my account of the evolution of monoamine theories into neuroplasticity theories to be compelling. They especially seem to find my principal argument to be persuasive: Until quite recently, the use of drugs to generate and test pathophysiological hypotheses—the pharmacological bridge—has been a paramount driving force in psychiatric research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 309-310 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 25 |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 Dec 6 |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- History of Technology
- Psychiatry
- Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining biological depression theories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Article
-
Let the drugs lead the way! On the unfolding of a research programme in psychiatry
Mulinari, S., 2018 Dec 6, In: Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology. 4, 25, p. 289-302 13 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Projects
- 1 Finished
-
After the success with the new generation antidepressants: Experiences, practices, discourses and changes in the self.
Sandell, K. (Researcher) & Mulinari, S. (Researcher)
2010/01/01 → 2015/12/31
Project: Research