Faith and Hope in Situations of Epistemic Uncertainty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

When it comes to religion, lack of conclusive evidence leads many reflective thinkers to embrace agnosticism. However, pure agnosticism does not necessarily have to be the final word; there are other attitudes one might reasonably adopt in a situation of epistemic uncertainty. This article concentrates on J. L. Schellenberg's proposal that non-doxastic propositional faith is available even when belief is unwarranted. Schellenberg's view is rejected since his envisaged notion of faith conflicts with important epistemic aims. Instead, it is suggested that a combination of hope and ‘occasional’ faith constitutes a substantive religious pro-attitude rationally available in situations of epistemic uncertainty.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-335
JournalReligious Studies: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion
Volume55
Issue number3
Early online date2018 May 6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Philosophy
  • Religious Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Faith and Hope in Situations of Epistemic Uncertainty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this