From Theory to Practice. Temporary International Presence in Hebron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This article examines the role of third parties in asymmetric conflicts and international peacekeeping in theory and practice. Various theoretical conceptualisations of peacekeeping are critically discussed and linked to conflict and negotiation theory. It argues that peacekeeping is a broad, transformative and context-dependent notion, highlighted by alterable meanings of impartiality, use of force, timing, consent and mandate. Based on the author's practice of peacekeeping, an empirical analysis of TIPH is made. It concludes that the mission comprises modes of traditional and multi-functional peacekeeping, whilst the mandate is based on a bilateral agreement that primarily focuses on addressing the asymmetry of power between the negotiating parties.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-69
JournalCambridge Review of International Affairs
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Political Science


  • Internationell politik


Dive into the research topics of 'From Theory to Practice. Temporary International Presence in Hebron'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this