Gender and regional differences in risk perception: Results from implementing the seveso II directive in Sweden

Misse Wester-Herber, Lars Erik Warg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper attempts to investigate whether there are gender and regional specific differences in risk perception in three municipalities in Sweden. It focuses on differences between gender and region with regard to risk perception, issues of trust and credibility as well as attitudes towards local industry and emergency response behaviour. This study is based on results from a larger study investigating the Seveso II Directive in Sweden. The aim of this paper is to investigate how gender and regional differences appear and in what way they should be taken into consideration when it comes to implementing national laws that deal with information to the public. The results show that there are differences between gender consistent with earlier findings, and also that there are regional differences which may influence the risk communication effort. Men tend to report having more knowledge of the industrial activities in their community and estimate the possible effect of an accident to be smaller than do women. Regional comparisons show that there are local variations with regard to estimated knowledge and the credibility of a source. Attempts are made to explain the gender differences from a power/infiuence perspective, and attribute the local variations to specific cultural contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-81
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Risk Research
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Other Social Sciences

Free keywords

  • Credibility
  • Gender differences
  • Regional differences
  • Risk perception
  • Seveso II Directive

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender and regional differences in risk perception: Results from implementing the seveso II directive in Sweden'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this