Globalization, socio-economic status and welfare chauvinism: European perspectives on attitudes toward the exclusion of immigrants

Jan Mewes, Steffen Mau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article addresses the question of whether globalization impacts individual preferences to exclude immigrants from national welfare systems ('welfare chauvinism'). Intergroup contact theory and arguments from the 'new cosmopolitanism' debate suggest that cross-border social contacts ('social globalization') foster a willingness to include and accept newcomers. However, group conflict theory suggests that trade openness ('economic globalization') can unleash feelings of insecurity and trigger welfare chauvinism. While these approaches point in different directions, we argue that the impact of globalization on welfare chauvinism differs across socio-economic status groups. Using cross-national data from the European Social Survey 2008/2009, we find scarce support for the hypothesis that social globalization reduces welfare chauvinism in general. However, there is evidence that it diminishes exclusionary attitudes among those with relatively high socio-economic statuses. Moreover, we find no general evidence for an impact of economic globalization on chauvinism, but a positive interaction of intensified engagement with global market forces and higher socio-economic status.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)228-245
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Comparative Sociology
Volume54
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jun 1
Externally publishedYes

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Anthropology, Demography and Criminology)

Free keywords

  • Attitudes
  • comparative research
  • globalization
  • immigration
  • socio-economic status
  • welfare state

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Globalization, socio-economic status and welfare chauvinism: European perspectives on attitudes toward the exclusion of immigrants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this