‘Hunger for Certainty’: Misrecognition, Masculinity and Agentic Action in India’s and Russia’s Desires for Neocolonial Subjecthood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article takes as its point of departure the postcolonial understanding of the nation as a subject constructed through the colonial encounter. It argues that at the core of both colonial and postcolonial subject formations lies a desire for reconstructing a homogeneous nation that fulfils a ‘hunger for certainty’. The use of the term ‘hunger for certainty’ testifies to the emotional as well as corporeal desires involved in the quest for recognition. However, any such quest is always a process of misrecognition, involving fantasies of impossible wholeness and fulfilment. Proceeding from a Lacanian account of sublimation, lack and desire, we analyse the relationship between misrecognition, ontological insecurity, masculinity and agentic action in two neocolonial settings: Russia and India. By discursively deconstructing the official discourse of those speaking in the name of the state – in our case, Vladimir Putin and Narendra Modi – we show how this ‘hunger for certainty’ is at the core of neocolonial agentic action and how desires for recognition are constantly underpinned by masculinity and unfulfilled desires for wholeness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)116-140
Number of pages25
JournalGlobal Discourse
Volume14
Issue number1
Early online date2024 Jan 12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Political Science (excluding Peace and Conflict Studies)
  • Political Science

Free keywords

  • ontological security
  • postcolonialism
  • empire
  • India
  • Russia
  • masculinity
  • misrecognition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘Hunger for Certainty’: Misrecognition, Masculinity and Agentic Action in India’s and Russia’s Desires for Neocolonial Subjecthood'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this