Abstract
The predominant way of modelling mortality rates is the Lee–Carter model and its many extensions. The Lee–Carter model and its many extensions use a latent process to forecast. These models are estimated using a two-step procedure that causes an inconsistent view on the latent variable. This paper considers identifiability issues of these models from a perspective that acknowledges the latent variable as a stochastic process from the beginning. We call this perspective the plug-in age–period or plug-in age–period–cohort model. Defining a parameter vector that includes the underlying parameters of this process rather than its realizations, we investigate whether the expected values and covariances of the plug-in Lee–Carter models are identifiable. It will be seen, for example, that even if in both steps of the estimation procedure we have identifiability in a certain sense it does not necessarily carry over to the plug-in models.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 117-125 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Insurance: Mathematics and Economics |
| Volume | 75 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 Jul 1 |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Probability Theory and Statistics
Free keywords
- Age–period model
- Age–period–cohort model
- Identifiability
- Lee–Carter model
- Plug-in Lee–Carter model
- Time series model
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Identifiability issues of age–period and age–period–cohort models of the Lee–Carter type'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver