In-Field System-Health Monitoring Based on IEEE 1687

Erik Larsson; Farrokh Ghani Zadegan; Dimitar Nikolov

doi:10.1109/SOCC.2016.7905437

In-Field System-Health Monitoring Based on IEEE 1687

Erik Larsson, Farrokh Ghani Zadegan, Dimitar Nikolov

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Paper in conference proceeding › peer-review

Abstract

Efficient handling of faults during operation is highly dependent on the interval (latency) from the time embedded instruments detect errors to the time when the fault manager localizes the errors. Detection and localization latencies are dependent on the network connecting fault-monitoring instruments to the fault manager. The network can be dedicated to fault-monitoring data, or used for functional data, as well - posing a trade-off between cost and performance (or predictability). As a middle-ground solution, fault-monitoring networks based on existing IEEE 1687 networks have been proposed. In this paper, we provide an overview of such solutions based on IEEE 1687, detail fault detection and localization procedure for each, and compare them regarding fault detection and localization time.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings - 29th IEEE International System on Chip Conference, SOCC 2016
Publisher	IEEE Computer Society
Pages	69-74
Number of pages	6
ISBN (Electronic)	978-1-5090-1367-8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/SOCC.2016.7905437
Publication status	Published - 2016 Sept 6
Event	29th IEEE International System on Chip Conference, SOCC 2016 - Seattle, United States Duration: 2016 Sept 6 → 2016 Sept 9

Conference

Conference	29th IEEE International System on Chip Conference, SOCC 2016
Country/Territory	United States
City	Seattle
Period	2016/09/06 → 2016/09/09

Subject classification (UKÄ)

Computer Engineering

Free keywords

fault monitoring
IEEE 1687
time analysis

Access to Document

10.1109/SOCC.2016.7905437

Cite this

@inproceedings{4e1475201b64408ea9dc319de20caf34,

title = "In-Field System-Health Monitoring Based on IEEE 1687",

abstract = "Efficient handling of faults during operation is highly dependent on the interval (latency) from the time embedded instruments detect errors to the time when the fault manager localizes the errors. Detection and localization latencies are dependent on the network connecting fault-monitoring instruments to the fault manager. The network can be dedicated to fault-monitoring data, or used for functional data, as well - posing a trade-off between cost and performance (or predictability). As a middle-ground solution, fault-monitoring networks based on existing IEEE 1687 networks have been proposed. In this paper, we provide an overview of such solutions based on IEEE 1687, detail fault detection and localization procedure for each, and compare them regarding fault detection and localization time.",

keywords = "fault monitoring, IEEE 1687, time analysis",

author = "Erik Larsson and {Ghani Zadegan}, Farrokh and Dimitar Nikolov",

year = "2016",

month = sep,

day = "6",

doi = "10.1109/SOCC.2016.7905437",

language = "English",

pages = "69--74",

booktitle = "Proceedings - 29th IEEE International System on Chip Conference, SOCC 2016",

publisher = "IEEE Computer Society",

address = "United States",

note = "29th IEEE International System on Chip Conference, SOCC 2016 ; Conference date: 06-09-2016 Through 09-09-2016",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - In-Field System-Health Monitoring Based on IEEE 1687

AU - Larsson, Erik

AU - Ghani Zadegan, Farrokh

AU - Nikolov, Dimitar

PY - 2016/9/6

Y1 - 2016/9/6

N2 - Efficient handling of faults during operation is highly dependent on the interval (latency) from the time embedded instruments detect errors to the time when the fault manager localizes the errors. Detection and localization latencies are dependent on the network connecting fault-monitoring instruments to the fault manager. The network can be dedicated to fault-monitoring data, or used for functional data, as well - posing a trade-off between cost and performance (or predictability). As a middle-ground solution, fault-monitoring networks based on existing IEEE 1687 networks have been proposed. In this paper, we provide an overview of such solutions based on IEEE 1687, detail fault detection and localization procedure for each, and compare them regarding fault detection and localization time.

AB - Efficient handling of faults during operation is highly dependent on the interval (latency) from the time embedded instruments detect errors to the time when the fault manager localizes the errors. Detection and localization latencies are dependent on the network connecting fault-monitoring instruments to the fault manager. The network can be dedicated to fault-monitoring data, or used for functional data, as well - posing a trade-off between cost and performance (or predictability). As a middle-ground solution, fault-monitoring networks based on existing IEEE 1687 networks have been proposed. In this paper, we provide an overview of such solutions based on IEEE 1687, detail fault detection and localization procedure for each, and compare them regarding fault detection and localization time.

KW - fault monitoring

KW - IEEE 1687

KW - time analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019064959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/SOCC.2016.7905437

DO - 10.1109/SOCC.2016.7905437

M3 - Paper in conference proceeding

SP - 69

EP - 74

BT - Proceedings - 29th IEEE International System on Chip Conference, SOCC 2016

PB - IEEE Computer Society

T2 - 29th IEEE International System on Chip Conference, SOCC 2016

Y2 - 6 September 2016 through 9 September 2016

ER -

In-Field System-Health Monitoring Based on IEEE 1687

Abstract

Conference

Subject classification (UKÄ)

Free keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this