Interrogative Belief Revision in Modal Logic

Sebastian Enqvist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (SciVal)


The well known AGM framework for belief revision has recently been extended to include a model of the research agenda of the agent, i.e. a set of questions to which the agent wishes to find answers (Olsson & Westlund in Erkenntnis, 65, 165-183, 2006). The resulting model has later come to be called interrogative belief revision. While belief revision has been studied extensively from the point of view of modal logic, so far interrogative belief revision has only been dealt with in the metalanguage approach in which AGM was originally presented. In this paper, I show how to model interrogative belief revision in a modal object language using a class of operators for questions. In particular, the solution I propose will be shown to capture the notion of K-truncation, a method for agenda update in the case of expansion constructed by Olsson & Westlund. Two case studies are conducted: first, an interrogative extension of Krister Segerberg's system DDL, and then a similar extension of Giacomo Bonanno's modal logic for belief revision. Sound and complete axioms will be provided for both of the resulting logics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)527-548
JournalJournal of Philosophical Logic
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Philosophy


  • Belief revision
  • Modal logic
  • Questions
  • Research agenda


Dive into the research topics of 'Interrogative Belief Revision in Modal Logic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this