Isomorphism, Isopraxism and Isonymism: Complementary or Competing Processes?

Gudbjörg Erlingsdottir, Kajsa Lindberg

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearch

Abstract

New institutional theory has been critizised, for describing institutionalization as a static qualitative state rather than a process. In this paper we provide an extended understanding of the process of institutionalization by replacing the mechanical concept of diffusion by the concept of translation and an analytical model of "trevel of ideas". Analyzing the field material from three cases of translation of ides in Swedish health care sector we have traced not only various homogenizing but also heterogenizing processes which reproduce organizational ideas, models, and practices. In the paper we suggest and discuss how name, form, and practice can be seen as different expressions of an idea through which organizations can be homogenized or heteroginized in an institutional process.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGlobal Ideas: How Ideas, objects and Practices Travel in the Global Economy
EditorsBarbara Czarniawska, Guje Sévon
PublisherLiber
Pages47-70
ISBN (Print)91-47-07719-0
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Business Administration
  • Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Free keywords

  • Institutionalization
  • travel of ideas
  • translation
  • isomorphism
  • isopraxism
  • isonymism
  • homogenization
  • heterogenization
  • practice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Isomorphism, Isopraxism and Isonymism: Complementary or Competing Processes?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this