Ki67 and p53 immunohistochemistry reduces interobserver variation in assessment of Barrett's oesophagus.

Ester Lörinc, B Jakobsson, Göran Landberg, Bela Veress

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aims: To devise clinically applicable methods for assessing p53 and Ki67 immunohistochemical (IHC) reactivity in Barrett's oesophagus (BE) and to compare the interobserver agreement between these methods and routine haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) evaluation.

Methods and results: One hundred and fifteen biopsies diagnosed as BE, selected from the files of the University Hospital MAS, Malmö, were re-evaluated for dysplasia by three pathologists. For IHC analysis areas with the most prominent positivity were evaluated. The mean of p53+ epithelial nuclei/high-power field (HPF) was obtained by counting between 1 and 5 HPFs/biopsy. A proliferation quotient (PQ) was obtained by dividing the number of Ki67+ epithelial nuclei in the upper half by the lower half of the mucosa, using two HPFs. Mean κ values were 0.24, 0.71 and 0.52 for H&E, p53 and Ki67 evaluations, respectively. There was a correlation between increasing severity of dysplasia, IHC measurable overexpression of p53 and shift of the mucosal proliferation zone towards the surface, measured as PQ.

Conclusions: The described methods for p53 and Ki67 evaluation are more reproducible than routine H&E evaluation of BE. Furthermore, the IHC methods correlate with the severity of dysplasia and are useful supplementary prognostic markers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)642-648
JournalHistopathology
Volume46
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Bibliographical note

The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015.
The record was previously connected to the following departments: Pathology (Malmö) (013031000), Pathology, (Lund) (013030000)

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Cell and Molecular Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ki67 and p53 immunohistochemistry reduces interobserver variation in assessment of Barrett's oesophagus.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this