Linguistic Convergence in Verbs for Belief-forming Processes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

This paper has two goals. First, it aims to investigate the empirical assumptions of a recent proposal due to Olsson (forthcoming), according to which the generality problem for process-reliabilism can be approached by recruiting patterns and models from the basic-level research in cognitive psychology. Second, the paper attempts to generalize findings in the basic-level literature pertaining to concrete nouns to the abstract verbs that denote belief-forming processes. I will demonstrate that verbs for belief-forming processes exhibit the kind of linguistic convergence that is characteristic of basic-level words, although these words are not neatly taxonomically organized or associated with large feature sets. Next, I will evaluate and partially validate Olsson's proposal in light of these findings. I will provide some discussion of possible explanations of the results are discussed, as well as the impact these results have for structural models of basic-level advantage, and for the feasibility of the explanatory strategy that these models presuppose. Finally, I will conclude that even though no particular model is compromised by these results, they call into question the underlying explanatory strategy by highlighting its parochial nature.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)114-138
JournalPhilosophical Psychology
Volume28
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Philosophy

Keywords

  • Basic-Level Categories
  • Mental Terms
  • Reliabilism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Linguistic Convergence in Verbs for Belief-forming Processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this