Liposarcoma: a population-based epidemiologic and prognostic study of features of 43 patients, including tumor DNA content

Pelle Gustafson, Anders Rydholm, Helena Willén, Bo Baldetorp, Mårten Fernö, Måns Åkerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Different conceptions exist regarding the epidemiology and prognosis of liposarcoma, and several classification systems are in use. We analyzed a population-based, 25-year series of 43 patients with liposarcoma of the extremity or trunk wall. Follow-up was complete. The annual incidence was 0.12/10(5). The thigh was the most common location. One of 6 tumors was subcutaneous. Deep-seated tumors were larger than s.c. tumors. Among the 42 surgically treated patients, grade II (4-grade scale) was the most common malignancy grade. Four tumors were well-differentiated, 24 were predominantly myxoid, 4 predominantly round-cell, and 10 were predominantly of pleomorphic type. The 5-year metastasis-free survival rate was 69%. By univariate analysis increasing malignancy grade, tumor necrosis, vascular invasion, mitotic count, subtype other than well-differentiated, and high cellularity were prognostic for metastatic disease. However, in the multivariate analysis only tumor necrosis was an independent risk factor. Tumor necrosis should be considered when prognosis of liposarcoma of the extremity and trunk wall is evaluated.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)541-546
JournalInternational Journal of Cancer
Volume55
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1993

Bibliographical note

The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015.
The record was previously connected to the following departments: Pathology, (Lund) (013030000), Oncology, MV (013035000), Department of Orthopaedics (Lund) (013028000)

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Cancer and Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Liposarcoma: a population-based epidemiologic and prognostic study of features of 43 patients, including tumor DNA content'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this