Long-term Outcomes of Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy and Transanal Drainage for Anastomotic Leakage After Anterior Resection

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background/Aim: Anastomotic leakage (AL) after anterior resection for rectal cancer occurs in up to 26% of patients. In the last decade, endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has gained interest as a treatment option for AL. This study aimed to compare the clinical success rate of EVT versus transanal drainage (TD) in AL treatment and investigate whether the frequency of bowel continuity differed. Patients and Methods: Patients treated for rectal cancer at the Skåne University Hospital, Sweden between 2009-2018 were identified through the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR). Patient characteristics, operative and AL data were retrieved by SCRCR and chart review. Results: Out of 1,095 patients subjected to rectal cancer surgery, 361 patients had undergone anterior resection. AL occurred in 39 patients, of these 14 patients were treated with EVT and 17 with TD. Bowel continuity was achieved in 50% of patients treated with EVT and 65% of patients treated with TD (p=0.28). The patients were under treatment for a median period of 24.5 days (IQR=11-36 days) when treated with EVT and 37 days (IQR=17-51 days) with TD. Conclusion: No superiority of EVT treatment could be shown in restoring bowel continuity. This questions the role of EVT in AL treatment after anterior resection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2275-2278
Number of pages4
JournalIn Vivo
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022 Sept

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Surgery

Free keywords

  • anastomotic leakage
  • anterior resection
  • endoscopic vacuum therapy
  • Rectal cancer
  • transanal drainage

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term Outcomes of Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy and Transanal Drainage for Anastomotic Leakage After Anterior Resection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this