Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to systematically search for long-term complications, including Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF), in patients who were previously administered the gadolinium-based contrast agent Gadofosveset at our institute. Materials and methods: All patients who were administered Gadofosveset at our institute between 2006 and 2009 were identified in our Radiological Information System (RIS). Clinical data such as cause of death during follow-up, and dermatological or nephrological diseases were systematically searched for in electronic patient records (EPR). Results: During 2006–2009, Gadofosveset was administered a total of 67 times to 62 patients. One patient was unavailable for follow-up. The remaining 61 patients were followed up for up to 14 (median 12) years based on RIS and EPR data. There were 13 deaths among the 61 patients, all assessed as unrelated to Gadofosveset administration. No dermatological or renal disease suggestive of NSF, or potentially related to Gadofosveset administration, was found. At the time of examination, six patients were diagnosed with various stages of renal insufficiency, three of whom were on hemodialysis. Another three patients were diagnosed with renal insufficiency during the follow-up period, but none of these diagnoses were suspected to be related to the administration of Gadofosveset. Conclusions: Based on the results of this retrospective safety analysis of up to 14 years following 1–2 exposures, we conclude that Gadofosveset in clinical practice is safe in the long-term.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-73
Number of pages4
JournalMagnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume86
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems

Keywords

  • Blood pool contrast medium
  • Gadofosveset
  • Gadolinium based contrast agent (GBCA)
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term safety of Gadofosveset in clinical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this