Marital status, social capital, material conditions and self-rated health: A population-based study.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

AIMS: Associations between marital status and self-rated health were investigated, adjusting for material conditions and trust (social capital). METHODS: The 2004 public-health survey in Skåne is a cross-sectional study. A total of 27,757 persons aged 18-80 years answered a postal questionnaire, which represents 59% of the random sample. A logistic regression model was used to investigate associations between marital status and self-rated health, adjusting for economic problems and trust. RESULTS: The prevalence of poor self-rated health was 28.7% among men and 33.2% among women. Older respondents, respondents born abroad, with medium/low education, low emotional support, low instrumental support, economic problems, low trust, never married and divorced had significantly higher odds ratios of poor self-rated health than their respective reference group. Low trust was significantly higher among the divorced and unmarried compared to the married/cohabitating. Adjustment for economic problems but not for trust reduced the odds ratios of poor self-rated health among the divorced, which became not significant among men. CONCLUSIONS: Never married and the divorced have significantly higher age-adjusted odds ratios of poor self-rated health than the married/cohabitating group. Economic problems but not trust seem to affect the association between marital status and poor self-rated health.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)172-179
JournalHealth Policy
Volume93
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
  • Environmental Health and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Marital status, social capital, material conditions and self-rated health: A population-based study.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this