Research output per year
Research output per year
S. Olofsson, U. G. Gerdtham, L. Hultkrantz, U. Persson
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
For the assessment of value of new therapies in healthcare, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) agencies often review the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Some HTA agencies accept a higher cost per QALY gained when treatment is aimed at prolonging survival for patients with a short expected remaining lifetime, a so-called end-of-life (EoL) premium. The objective of this study is to elicit the existence and size of an EoL premium in cancer. Data was collected from 509 individuals in the Swedish general population 20–80 years old using a web-based questionnaire. Preferences were elicited using subjective risk estimation and the contingent valuation (CV) method. A split-sample design was applied to test for order bias. The mean value of a QALY was MSEK4.8 (€528,000), and there was an EoL premium of 4–10% at 6 months of expected remaining lifetime. Using subjective risk resulted in more robust and valid estimates of the value of a QALY. Order of scenarios did not have a significant impact on the WTP and the result showed scale sensitivity. Our result provides some support for the use of an EoL premium based on individual preferences when expected remaining lifetime is short and below 24 months. Furthermore, we find support for a value of a QALY that is above the current threshold of several HTA agencies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 807-820 |
Journal | European Journal of Health Economics |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 6 |
Early online date | 2017 Aug 12 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2018 Jul |
Research output: Thesis › Doctoral Thesis (compilation)
Research output: Working paper/Preprint › Working paper