Measuring Up to the Humanities: Navigating the Epistemological Advantage of Classical Humanism in Nineteenth-Century Scholarly Periodicals

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the epistemological hierarchy around the middle
of the nineteenth century in Sweden through efforts to mobilize support
for natural science in scholarly periodicals. It is argued that scholarly
communication was key to achieving legitimacy for natural science, but
that such efforts were mitigated by a dominant view of the humanities
in general and classical humanism in particular as more valuable to
society. Tensions between natural science and classical humanism were
expressed in negotiations of the nebulous concept of bildning – the Swedish
equivalent of the German Bildung – and the article demonstrates how
natural scientists tried to navigate its semantic usage and advocate the
view that natural science could achieve the educational goals associated
with classical humanism.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Humanities and the Modern Politics of Knowledge
Subtitle of host publicationThe Impact and Organization of the Humanities in Sweden, 1850-2020
EditorsAnders Ekström, Hampus Östh Gustafsson
Place of PublicationAmsterdam
PublisherAmsterdam University Press
Pages39-59
ISBN (Electronic)978-90-4855-502-4
ISBN (Print)978-94-6372-886-7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Publication series

NameStudies in the History of Knowledge

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • History of Science and Ideas
  • History
  • Other Humanities not elsewhere specified

Free keywords

  • classical humanism
  • scholarly journals
  • epistemological hierarchy
  • Bildung
  • two cultures

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring Up to the Humanities: Navigating the Epistemological Advantage of Classical Humanism in Nineteenth-Century Scholarly Periodicals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this