TY - JOUR
T1 - Membrane assisted processing of acetone, butanol, and ethanol (ABE) aqueous streams
AU - Knozowska, Katarzyna
AU - Kujawska, Anna
AU - Li, Guoqiang
AU - Kujawa, Joanna
AU - Bryjak, Marek
AU - Kujawski, Wojciech
AU - Lipnizki, Frank
AU - Ahrné, Lilia
AU - Petrinić, Irena
AU - Kujawski, Jan K.
PY - 2021/9/1
Y1 - 2021/9/1
N2 - Downstream processing of ABE fermentation broth is challenging issue. In this work, results of the application of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic commercial membranes during the pervaporation of ABE aqueous mixtures were investigated and presented. Hydrophobic pervaporation experiments were performed using ABE-water mixtures containing 0-5 wt% of organics in feed, using commercial membranes: POMS, PEBAX, and PervapTM4060. Separation factor and Pervaporation Separation Index were employed to discuss hydrophobic pervaporation results. PervapTM4060 membrane revealed the best separation performance in the removal of ABE components from diluted aqueous mixtures mimicking the fermentation broth, resulting in two-phase permeate containing ca. 34 wt% of organics. The subsequent liquid-liquid phase separation resulted in the organic phase containing 62 wt% of ABE. Hydrophilic pervaporation experiments were performed in contact with ABE-water system initially comprising 38 wt% of water applying both the PervapTM4100 PVA based polymeric membrane and modified silica ceramic one. Application of hydrophilic membranes allowed for the complete dewatering of ABE-water mixtures. Eventually, the combination of membrane separation processes (microfiltration, hydrophobic pervaporation, hydrophobic thermopervaporation, membrane distillation, and hydrophilic pervaporation) enhanced by the liquid-liquid phase separation was suggested for the recovery and dehydration of ABE aqueous mixture.
AB - Downstream processing of ABE fermentation broth is challenging issue. In this work, results of the application of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic commercial membranes during the pervaporation of ABE aqueous mixtures were investigated and presented. Hydrophobic pervaporation experiments were performed using ABE-water mixtures containing 0-5 wt% of organics in feed, using commercial membranes: POMS, PEBAX, and PervapTM4060. Separation factor and Pervaporation Separation Index were employed to discuss hydrophobic pervaporation results. PervapTM4060 membrane revealed the best separation performance in the removal of ABE components from diluted aqueous mixtures mimicking the fermentation broth, resulting in two-phase permeate containing ca. 34 wt% of organics. The subsequent liquid-liquid phase separation resulted in the organic phase containing 62 wt% of ABE. Hydrophilic pervaporation experiments were performed in contact with ABE-water system initially comprising 38 wt% of water applying both the PervapTM4100 PVA based polymeric membrane and modified silica ceramic one. Application of hydrophilic membranes allowed for the complete dewatering of ABE-water mixtures. Eventually, the combination of membrane separation processes (microfiltration, hydrophobic pervaporation, hydrophobic thermopervaporation, membrane distillation, and hydrophilic pervaporation) enhanced by the liquid-liquid phase separation was suggested for the recovery and dehydration of ABE aqueous mixture.
KW - Membrane processes
KW - Pervaporation
KW - Fermentation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85107644084
U2 - 10.1016/j.cep.2021.108462
DO - 10.1016/j.cep.2021.108462
M3 - Article
SN - 0255-2701
VL - 166
JO - Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification
JF - Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification
M1 - 108462
ER -