Mendacity and Kingship in Shakespeare's Henry V and Richard III

Eric Pudney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Shakespeare’s Henry V and Richard III both practise mendacity, but while Henry V celebrates Henry’s capacity for deceit, the king’s lies are condemned in Richard III. The plays show how similar patterns of behaviour in early modern England could be represented as either virtuous or evil by means of rhetoric, while the similar behaviour of the two kings suggests a broad awareness of the necessity of deceit as a political skill. These two plays also draw attention to their own rhetorical distortions in ways which have appeared troubling to many modern critics, but which exemplify humanist ideas about education through rhetorical ‘lies’.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-175
JournalEuropean Journal of English Studies
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Studies of Specific Literatures (including Literature from specific Language areas)

Free keywords

  • Shakespeare
  • mendacity
  • kingship
  • humanist writers
  • Richard III
  • Henry V
  • early modern political theory
  • history plays

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mendacity and Kingship in Shakespeare's Henry V and Richard III'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this