Mercury methylation in the hypolimnetic waters of lakes with and without connection to wetlands in northern Wisconsin

CS Eckley, CJ Watras, H Hintelmann, K Morrison, AD Kent, Olof Regnell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    248 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Rates of Hg methylation and demethylation were measured in anoxic hypolimnetic waters of two pristine Wisconsin lakes using stable isotopes of Hg as tracers. One of the lakes is a clear-water seepage lake situated in sandy terrain with minimal wetland influence. The other is a dark-water lake receiving channelized inputs from a relatively large terrestrial wetland. Methyl mercury (MeHg) accumulated in the anoxic hypolimnia of both lakes during summer stratification, reaching concentrations of 0.8 ng center dot L-1 in the clear-water lake and 5 ng center dot L-1 in the dark-water lake. The stable isotopic assays indicated that rate constants of Hg-(II) methylation (K-m) ranged from 0.01 to 0.04 center dot day(-1) in the clear-water lake and from 0.01 to 0.09 center dot day(-1) in the dark-water lake, depending on the depth stratum. On average, K-m was threefold greater in the dark-water lake. Hypolimnetic demethylation rate constants (K-dm) averaged 0.03 center dot day(-1) in the clear-water lake and 0.05 center dot day(-1) in the dark-water lake. These methylation rates were sufficient to account for the observed accumulation of MeHg in hypolimnetic water during summer in both lakes. Despite substantial export of MeHg from the wetland to the dark-water lake, our study indicates that in-lake production and decomposition of MeHg dominated the MeHg cycle in both lakes.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)400-411
    JournalCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
    Volume62
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Subject classification (UKÄ)

    • Ecology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Mercury methylation in the hypolimnetic waters of lakes with and without connection to wetlands in northern Wisconsin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this