Methods to simplify diet and food life cycle inventories: Accuracy versus data-collection resources

Franck Pernollet, Carla R.V. Coelho, Hayo M.G. van der Werf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The number of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies on foods and diets steadily increases. However, due to lack of data on food products as well as time and resource constraints, many of these studies ignore part of the system (e.g. cooking and waste in the household), which may lead to underestimating impacts greatly. This LCA study compared diets using six methods with different system boundaries; three of these are simplified methods we developed. The aim was to identify which method best optimizes data collection for life cycle inventories from cradle to human mouth of food products and diets. The principle behind the three simplified methods was that, for many foods and impact categories, the farm (or fishery) is the life cycle stage that contributes most to impacts. One average, one healthy and one vegetarian diet, each composed of up to 105 foods, were assessed. Climate change, cumulative energy demand, eutrophication, acidification and land occupation impacts were estimated. Recommendations are given on which methods, depending on study goals, offer the best trade-off among available resources (time, money, and knowledge), while providing the required robustness of results. Compared to a full LCA, simplified LCA methods can yield more accurate results at a lower cost of data collection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)410-420
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume140
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Environmental Management

Free keywords

  • Data-collection
  • Diet
  • Food
  • LCA
  • LCI
  • Method

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Methods to simplify diet and food life cycle inventories: Accuracy versus data-collection resources'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this