More on how and why: response to commentaries

Kevin Laland, John Odling-Smee, William Hoppitt, Tobias Uller

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

We are grateful to the commentators for taking the time to respond to our article. Too many interesting and important points have been raised for us to tackle them all in this response, and so in the below we have sought to draw out the major themes. These include problems with both the term ‘ultimate causation’ and the proximate-ultimate causation dichotomy more generally, clarification of the meaning of reciprocal causation, discussion of issues related to the nature of development and phenotypic plasticity and their roles in evolution, and consideration of the need for an extended evolutionary synthesis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)793-810
JournalBiology & Philosophy
Volume28
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Biological Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'More on how and why: response to commentaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this