Motivation to donate or not donate surplus embryos for stem-cell research: literature review

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective

To review publications regarding possible donation of surplus embryos for medical research.
Design

Review of 67 scientific publications in this field up through January 2007.
Originality

Summary of factors influencing prospective donors' motivation to donate or not donate their surplus embryos for medical research.
Result(s)

Presentation of the findings of studies regarding the need and availability of quality human embryos for stem-cell research, discussion of the use of nonoptimal quality embryos for research, and presentation of the findings of several studies regarding the attitudes of fertility patients toward embryo donation for research in general and for stem-cell research in particular. In addition, discussion of the difficulty of such decision making and presentation of suggested strategies to facilitate reasoned, reflective, and timely decisions by prospective donors.
Conclusion(s)

The major part of this article presents the findings of studies regarding the factors influencing couples' decisions about whether or not to donate surplus embryos for research. Research purpose, treatment stage, embryo quality, religious beliefs, and altruism appear to be important for donation. Being at the beginning of treatment, not knowing the aim of medical research, or having good-quality embryos appear to motivate those who answer that they do not want to donate.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)263-277
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume89
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine

Free keywords

  • embryonic stem cell
  • medical research
  • embryo donation
  • Assisted reproductive technologies
  • motivation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Motivation to donate or not donate surplus embryos for stem-cell research: literature review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this