TY - JOUR
T1 - MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis
AU - Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
AU - Rannikko, Antti S.
AU - Borghi, Marcelo
AU - Panebianco, Valeria
AU - Mynderse, Lance A.
AU - Vaarala, Markku H.
AU - Briganti, Alberto
AU - Budäus, Lars
AU - Hellawell, Giles
AU - Hindley, Richard G.
AU - Roobol, Monique J.
AU - Eggener, Scott
AU - Ghei, Maneesh
AU - Villers, Arnauld
AU - Bladou, Franck
AU - Villeirs, Geert M.
AU - Virdi, Jaspal
AU - Boxler, Silvan
AU - Robert, Grégoire
AU - Singh, Paras B.
AU - Venderink, Wulphert
AU - Hadaschik, Boris A.
AU - Ruffion, Alain
AU - Hu, Jim C.
AU - Margolis, Daniel
AU - Crouzet, Sébastien
AU - Klotz, Laurence
AU - Taneja, Samir S.
AU - Pinto, Peter
AU - Gill, Inderbir
AU - Allen, Clare
AU - Giganti, Francesco
AU - Freeman, Alex
AU - Morris, Stephen
AU - Punwani, Shonit
AU - Williams, Norman R.
AU - Brew-graves, Chris
AU - Deeks, Jonathan
AU - Takwoingi, Yemisi
AU - Emberton, Mark
AU - Moore, Caroline M.
AU - Kenttämies, Anu
AU - Mirtti, Tuomas
AU - Becher, Edgardo F.
AU - Catalano, Carlo
AU - Grompone, Marcello
AU - Del Monte, Maurizio
AU - Costantino, Leonardo
AU - Sciarra, Alessandro
AU - PRECISION Study Group Collaborators
A2 - Bjartell, Anders
PY - 2018/5/10
Y1 - 2018/5/10
N2 - BACKGROUND: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with or without targeted biopsy, is an alternative to standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy for prostate-cancer detection in men with a raised prostate-specific antigen level who have not undergone biopsy. However, comparative evidence is limited. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial, we assigned men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who had not undergone biopsy previously to undergo MRI, with or without targeted biopsy, or standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy. Men in the MRI-targeted biopsy group underwent a targeted biopsy (without standard biopsy cores) if the MRI was suggestive of prostate cancer; men whose MRI results were not suggestive of prostate cancer were not offered biopsy. Standard biopsy was a 10-to-12-core, transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy. The primary outcome was the proportion of men who received a diagnosis of clinically significant cancer. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of men who received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer. RESULTS: A total of 500 men underwent randomization. In the MRI-targeted biopsy group, 71 of 252 men (28%) had MRI results that were not suggestive of prostate cancer, so they did not undergo biopsy. Clinically significant cancer was detected in 95 men (38%) in the MRI-targeted biopsy group, as compared with 64 of 248 (26%) in the standard-biopsy group (adjusted difference, 12 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4 to 20; P = 0.005). MRI, with or without targeted biopsy, was noninferior to standard biopsy, and the 95% confidence interval indicated the superiority of this strategy over standard biopsy. Fewer men in the MRI-targeted biopsy group than in the standard-biopsy group received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer (adjusted difference, -13 percentage points; 95% CI, -19 to -7; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of risk assessment with MRI before biopsy and MRI-targeted biopsy was superior to standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy in men at clinical risk for prostate cancer who had not undergone biopsy previously. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research and the European Association of Urology Research Foundation; PRECISION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02380027.)
AB - BACKGROUND: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with or without targeted biopsy, is an alternative to standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy for prostate-cancer detection in men with a raised prostate-specific antigen level who have not undergone biopsy. However, comparative evidence is limited. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial, we assigned men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who had not undergone biopsy previously to undergo MRI, with or without targeted biopsy, or standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy. Men in the MRI-targeted biopsy group underwent a targeted biopsy (without standard biopsy cores) if the MRI was suggestive of prostate cancer; men whose MRI results were not suggestive of prostate cancer were not offered biopsy. Standard biopsy was a 10-to-12-core, transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy. The primary outcome was the proportion of men who received a diagnosis of clinically significant cancer. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of men who received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer. RESULTS: A total of 500 men underwent randomization. In the MRI-targeted biopsy group, 71 of 252 men (28%) had MRI results that were not suggestive of prostate cancer, so they did not undergo biopsy. Clinically significant cancer was detected in 95 men (38%) in the MRI-targeted biopsy group, as compared with 64 of 248 (26%) in the standard-biopsy group (adjusted difference, 12 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4 to 20; P = 0.005). MRI, with or without targeted biopsy, was noninferior to standard biopsy, and the 95% confidence interval indicated the superiority of this strategy over standard biopsy. Fewer men in the MRI-targeted biopsy group than in the standard-biopsy group received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer (adjusted difference, -13 percentage points; 95% CI, -19 to -7; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of risk assessment with MRI before biopsy and MRI-targeted biopsy was superior to standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy in men at clinical risk for prostate cancer who had not undergone biopsy previously. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research and the European Association of Urology Research Foundation; PRECISION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02380027.)
UR - https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa1801993/suppl_file/nejmoa1801993_appendix.pdf
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993
M3 - Article
C2 - 29552975
AN - SCOPUS:85044242970
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 378
SP - 1767
EP - 1777
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 19
ER -