TY - GEN
T1 - Multimodal levels of prominence
T2 - Fonetik 2015
AU - Ambrazaitis, Gilbert
AU - Svensson Lundmark, Malin
AU - House, David
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - This paper presents a first analysis of the distribution of head and eyebrow movements as a function of (a) phonological prominence levels (focal, non-focal) and (b) word accent (Accent 1, Accent 2) in Swedish news broadcasts. Our corpus consists of 31 brief news readings, comprising speech from four speakers and 986 words in total. A head movement was annotated for 229 (23.2%) of the words,
while eyebrow movements occurred much more sparsely (67 cases or 6.8%). Results of χ2-tests revealed a dependency of the distribution of movements on the one hand and focal accents on the other, while no systematic effect of the word accent type was found. However, there was an effect of the word accent type on the annotation of ‘double’ head movements. These occurred very sparsely, and predominantly
in connection with focally accented compounds (Accent 2), which are
characterized by two lexical stresses. Overall, our results suggests that head beats might have a closer association with phonological prosodic structure, while eyebrow movements might be more restricted to higher-level prominence and information-structure coding. Hence, head and eyebrow movements can represent two quite different modalities of prominence cuing, both from a formal and functional
point of view, rather than just being cumulative prominence markers.
AB - This paper presents a first analysis of the distribution of head and eyebrow movements as a function of (a) phonological prominence levels (focal, non-focal) and (b) word accent (Accent 1, Accent 2) in Swedish news broadcasts. Our corpus consists of 31 brief news readings, comprising speech from four speakers and 986 words in total. A head movement was annotated for 229 (23.2%) of the words,
while eyebrow movements occurred much more sparsely (67 cases or 6.8%). Results of χ2-tests revealed a dependency of the distribution of movements on the one hand and focal accents on the other, while no systematic effect of the word accent type was found. However, there was an effect of the word accent type on the annotation of ‘double’ head movements. These occurred very sparsely, and predominantly
in connection with focally accented compounds (Accent 2), which are
characterized by two lexical stresses. Overall, our results suggests that head beats might have a closer association with phonological prosodic structure, while eyebrow movements might be more restricted to higher-level prominence and information-structure coding. Hence, head and eyebrow movements can represent two quite different modalities of prominence cuing, both from a formal and functional
point of view, rather than just being cumulative prominence markers.
KW - focus
KW - beat gesture
KW - focal accent
KW - information structure
M3 - Paper in conference proceeding
VL - 55
T3 - Working Papers in General Linguistics and Phonetics
SP - 11
EP - 16
BT - Proceedings from Fonetik 2015
A2 - Svensson Lundmark, Malin
A2 - Ambrazaitis, Gilbert
A2 - van de Weijer, Joost
PB - Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University
Y2 - 8 June 2015 through 10 June 2015
ER -