Multiple-Strain Infections of Borrelia afzelii: A Role for Within-Host Interactions in the Maintenance of Antigenic Diversity?

Martin Andersson, Kristin Scherman, Lars Råberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Genetically diverse infections are common but little is known about what effects coinfecting strains have on each other in natural host-parasite systems. To explore the nature and consequences of interactions in the wild, we studied the tick-transmitted bacterium Borrelia afzelii in one of its main reservoir hosts, the bank vole Myodes glareolus. We measured overall infection intensity with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and resolved the composition of multiple infections using strain-specific PCR assays targeting the ospC gene (which encodes an immunodominant surface protein). We found seven different strains, as defined by ospC genotype. There was little evidence for interactions affecting infection intensities, but strains were highly aggregated (i.e., there were more multiple infections than expected from random co-occurrence). Moreover, there was a positive correlation between the difference at the amino acid level between two OspC types and their degree of association. Overall, the observed patterns suggest that facilitation is more important than competition in this system and that more diverse infections have an advantage in establishing and/or maintaining infection. We propose that this advantage is one of the factors that favors antigenic diversity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)545-554
JournalAmerican Naturalist
Volume181
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Biological Sciences

Free keywords

  • competition
  • facilitation
  • multiple infections
  • strain diversity
  • virulence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multiple-Strain Infections of Borrelia afzelii: A Role for Within-Host Interactions in the Maintenance of Antigenic Diversity?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this