Research output per year
Research output per year
Abstract
In this essay in honour of Christina Moëll, we focus on one particular recent case: the Philip Morris case delivered in May 2016 where the European Court of Justice (ECJ) rules on the validity of the Tobacco Product Directive case.1 It is a key case on the application of the principle of proportionality but not only since it connects this principle with other constitutional principles putting limits to the regulatory action such as fundamental rights and the principle of subsidiarity. This case constitutes a
perfect illustration of ‘administrative constitutionalism’, a doctrine which encapsulates the academic work of Christina Moëll in a nutshell.
perfect illustration of ‘administrative constitutionalism’, a doctrine which encapsulates the academic work of Christina Moëll in a nutshell.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Festskrift till Christina Moell |
| Editors | Mats Tjernberg, Pernilla Rendahl, Henrik Wenander |
| Place of Publication | Lund |
| Publisher | Juristförlaget i Lund |
| Pages | 83-101 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9789154405725 |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Law
Free keywords
- Proportionality principle
- Subsidiarity
- Impact assessment
- EU law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'New Directions in Judicial Review? Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Impact Assessment in the Tobacco Product Directive Case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Anthology (editor)
-
Festskrift till Christina Moëll
Tjernberg, M. (Editor), Rendahl, P. (Editor) & Wenander, H. (Editor), 2017, Lund: Juristförlaget i Lund. 564 p.Research output: Book/Report › Anthology (editor) › Research