Novel Assay of Metformin Levels in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Varying Levels of Renal Function Clinical recommendations

Anders Frid, Gunnar Sterner, Magnus Löndahl, Clara Wiklander, Anne Cato, Ellen Vinge, Anders S Andersson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

AbstractObjective: To study trough levels of metformin in serum and its intra individual variation in patients using a newly developed assay. Research Design and Methods: Trough serum levels of metformin was measured once using Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LcMSMS) in 137 type 2 diabetes patients with varying renal function (99 men) and followed repeatedly during two months in 20 patients (16 men) with estimated GFR (eGFR) below 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) body surface. Results: Patients with eGFR >60, 30-60, and <30 ml/min/1.73 m(2) had a median trough metformin concentration of 4.5 mumol/l (range 0.1-20.7, n=107), 7.71 mumol/l (0.12-15.15, n=21), and 8.88 mumol/l (5.99-18.60, n=9), respectively. The median intraindividual overall coefficient of variation (CV) was 29.4 % (range 9,8-74,2). Conclusions: Determination of serum metformin with the LCMSMS technique is useful in patients on metformin treatment. Few patients had values over 20 mumol/L. Metformin measurement is less suitable for dose titration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1291-1293
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Bibliographical note

The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015.
The record was previously connected to the following departments: Pediatrics/Urology/Gynecology/Endocrinology (013240400), Internal Medicine Research Unit (013242520), Medicine (Lund) (013230025), Division of Clinical Chemistry and Pharmacology (013250300)

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Endocrinology and Diabetes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Novel Assay of Metformin Levels in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Varying Levels of Renal Function Clinical recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this