Abstract
This text highlights the neglected dimension of justice in the design of sustainable pension systems. This is done through an analysis of the current Swedish pay-as-you-go pension system, which is often described as exemplarily sustainable. The detailed analysis singles out four distributional effects that the system produces and which can be considered unfair: (1) that the old have to carry most of the risks of economic recessions; (2) that the least well off among the old are disadvantaged by the use of average life expectancy to index benefits in the system; (3) that the system reproduces and magnifies existing inequalities among the old; and (4) that the payoff from contributing to the system is low, in particular for low-wage workers. The text ends with some suggested reforms which aim to make the pension system more just and hence more sustainable.
| Translated title of the contribution | On the Significance of Justice for Sustainable Pension Systems: An Analysis and Critique of the Swedish Pension System |
|---|---|
| Original language | Swedish |
| Pages (from-to) | 223-247 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift |
| Volume | 123 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 Sept 28 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Economics and Business
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On the Significance of Justice for Sustainable Pension Systems: An Analysis and Critique of the Swedish Pension System'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver