On word order and case in Old Italian past participle constructions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

While in Modern Italian, V1 is mandatory in absolute constructions, no such restriction is operative in Old Italian. On the surface, such a fact could be interpreted as a sign of residual V-to-Comp movement in Modern Italian. However, it is not: In Old Italian, participles targeted a position lower than Comp and, hence, the V1 pattern of Modern Italian is an innovation rather than a residue from the earlier stage. The difference between the two grammars lies in the interaction of independent properties of Old Italian and Modern Italian: First, in Old Italian, two arguments can be case licensed because of the presence of a Tense Phrase in the participle clause. In Modern Italian, where no Tense Phrase is projected, nominative can only be licensed by focus as an instance of default case assignment. Second, a general change relating to information structure has as its consequence that a focused argument is realized post-verbally in Modern Italian, which explains the obligatory V1 pattern.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6
Pages (from-to)1-20
JournalIsogloss
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Languages and Literature

Free keywords

  • default case
  • gerund
  • Old Italian
  • participle
  • V1

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On word order and case in Old Italian past participle constructions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this