Abstract
A legal term that serves as a middle term in legal inferences can do so in different ways. A distinction between ‘mere’ vehicles of inference and operative middle terms will be shown to be important. It will be indicated how operative conditions give rise to the question of justificatory conformity or unconformity. At the end of the paper, it will be suggested how justificatory conformity is relevant to the coherence of legal argumentation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Associations |
| Publisher | Duncker & Humblot |
| Pages | 185-200 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Publication status | Published - 2003 |
| Event | Internationaler Verein für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie (IVR), 21st World Congress - Lund, Sweden Duration: 2003 Aug 12 → 2003 Aug 18 |
Conference
| Conference | Internationaler Verein für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie (IVR), 21st World Congress |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Sweden |
| City | Lund |
| Period | 2003/08/12 → 2003/08/18 |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Law
Free keywords
- rättsvetenskap
- law
- coherence.
- vehicles of inference
- justificatory conformity
- operative conditions