Oral Contraceptive Use and Breast Cancer Risk: Retrospective and Prospective Analyses From a BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carrier Cohort Study

Lieske H Schrijver, Håkan Olsson, Kelly-Anne Phillips, Mary Beth Terry, David E Goldgar, Karin Kast, Christoph Engel, Thea M Mooij, Julian Adlard, Daniel Barrowdale, Rosemarie Davidson, Ros Eeles, Steve Ellis, D Gareth Evans, Debra Frost, Louise Izatt, Mary E Porteous, Lucy E Side, Lisa Walker, Pascaline BerthetValérie Bonadona, Dominique Leroux, Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme, Laurence Venat-Bouvet, Saundra S Buys, Melissa C Southey, Esther M John, Wendy K Chung, Mary B Daly, Anita Bane, Christi J van Asperen, Encarna B Gómez Garcia, Marian J E Mourits, Theo A M van Os, Marie-José Roos-Blom, Michael L Friedlander, Sue-Anne McLachlan, Christian F Singer, Yen Y Tan, Lenka Foretova, Marie Navratilova, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Trinidad Caldes, Jacques Simard, Edith Olah, Anna Jakubowska, Brita Arver, Ana Osorio, Catherine Noguès, Nadine Andrieu, EMBRACE, GENEPSO, BCFR, HEBON, kConFab, IBCCS

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: For BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, the association between oral contraceptive preparation (OCP) use and breast cancer (BC) risk is still unclear.

Methods: Breast camcer risk associations were estimated from OCP data on 6030 BRCA1 and 3809 BRCA2 mutation carriers using age-dependent Cox regression, stratified by study and birth cohort. Prospective, left-truncated retrospective and full-cohort retrospective analyses were performed.

Results: For BRCA1 mutation carriers, OCP use was not associated with BC risk in prospective analyses (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75 to 1.56), but in the left-truncated and full-cohort retrospective analyses, risks were increased by 26% (95% CI = 6% to 51%) and 39% (95% CI = 23% to 58%), respectively. For BRCA2 mutation carriers, OCP use was associated with BC risk in prospective analyses (HR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.97), but retrospective analyses were inconsistent (left-truncated: HR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.33; full cohort: HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.28 to 1.81). There was evidence of increasing risk with duration of use, especially before the first full-term pregnancy (BRCA1: both retrospective analyses, P < .001 and P = .001, respectively; BRCA2: full retrospective analysis, P = .002).

Conclusions: Prospective analyses did not show that past use of OCP is associated with an increased BC risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers in young middle-aged women (40-50 years). For BRCA2 mutation carriers, a causal association is also not likely at those ages. Findings between retrospective and prospective analyses were inconsistent and could be due to survival bias or a true association for younger women who were underrepresented in the prospective cohort. Given the uncertain safety of long-term OCP use for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, indications other than contraception should be avoided and nonhormonal contraceptive methods should be discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberpky023
JournalJNCI Cancer Spectrum
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Apr

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Cancer and Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Oral Contraceptive Use and Breast Cancer Risk: Retrospective and Prospective Analyses From a BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carrier Cohort Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this