Organizational discourse analysis - well done or too rare? A reply to our critics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (SciVal)


In this article we respond to Bargiela-Chiappini, Iedema and Mumby.We notice that there is considerable agreement concerning the state of the art of organizational discourse analysis, while also discussing the disagreements. We expand on some of the ontological issues inherent in our argument, further discuss the character of reductionism in organizational discourse analysis, the trappings of a priori assumptions, and, finally, argue that our critics themselves, perhaps inadvertently, tend to repeat the problematic moves we identified in our original article.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1193-1202
JournalHuman Relations
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Economics and Business
  • Business Administration


  • communication
  • discourse analysis
  • methodology
  • ontology
  • organization
  • studies


Dive into the research topics of 'Organizational discourse analysis - well done or too rare? A reply to our critics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this