Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Orthosis as prognostic instrument in lumbar fusion. No predictive value in 50 cases followed prospectively

Paul Axelsson, Ragnar Johnsson, Björn Strömqvist, Lars T Nilsson, M Åkesson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

To evaluate pain relief in a lumbar orthosis as a predictor for good clinical results after solid fusion, all patients scheduled for such a surgical procedure were preoperatively encouraged to use an orthosis, soft or rigid, for 3 weeks. Grade of back pain relief as a percent using the orthosis was assessed by the patients and was registered before surgery. After surgery, at 1-year follow-up, patients with nonunion demonstrated radiographically were excluded from the series. Thus, 50 patients with solid fusion could be identified and followed for at least 2 years prospectively. At follow-up these 50 patients graded the pain relief induced by the fusion. In the preoperative corset test, 31 patients experienced significant back pain relief, meaning a reduction of at least 50%. No applicable correlation was found, however, between outcome in this corset test and the eventual clinical result expressed as improvement/no improvement after solid fusion. The two types of orthoses did not differ in this aspect. We conclude that the orthosis, rigid or soft, is not a useful instrument when selecting patients for lumbar fusion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)284-8
JournalJournal of Spinal Disorders
Volume8
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1995

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Orthopaedics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Orthosis as prognostic instrument in lumbar fusion. No predictive value in 50 cases followed prospectively'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this