Out of steam? A social science and humanities research agenda for geothermal energy

Rozanne Spijkerboer, Ethemcan Turhan, Andreas Roos, Marco Billi, Sofia Vargas-Payera, Jose Opazo, Marco Armiero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The potential of geothermal energy for energy transition is increasingly recognized by governments around the world. Whether geothermal energy is a sustainable source of heat and/or electricity depends on how it is deployed in specific contexts. Therefore, it is striking that there is only limited attention to geothermal energy from a social science and humanities (SSH) perspective. Geothermal energy is largely conceptualized as a technological and/or geological issue in both science and practice. This perspective article aims to go beyond such conceptualizations by positioning social science research as an important lens to explore the promises and pitfalls of geothermal energy. We first provide an overview of the current state of geothermal energy as a decarbonization strategy. Second, we move on to review the existing literature. This review shows that studies that do address geothermal energy from an SSH perspective tend to be of a descriptive nature and lack analytical diversity. Third, we discuss three complementary theoretical approaches that are used in the social sciences to observe and address other forms of energy and energy transition. We believe that socio-technical assemblages, systems, and imaginaries can provide fruitful analytical lenses to study the promises, pitfalls and spatialization of geothermal energy. We conclude the paper with a research agenda and call for further engagement with this topic in SSH research, with attention to specificities of global South and North contexts.
Original languageEnglish
Article number102801
JournalEnergy Research & Social Science
Publication statusPublished - 2022 Oct 1

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Other Humanities not elsewhere specified
  • Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
  • Energy Systems


Dive into the research topics of 'Out of steam? A social science and humanities research agenda for geothermal energy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this