Patientrapporterade SEFAS: Frågeformulär bra utvärderingsmetod vid fot- och fotledsbesvär

Maria Cöster; Björn Rosengren; Åke Carlsson; Fredrik Montgomery; Magnus Karlsson

Patientrapporterade SEFAS: Frågeformulär bra utvärderingsmetod vid fot- och fotledsbesvär

Translated title of the contribution: Patient-reported SEFAS: Questionnaire good evaluation method in foot and ankle disorders

Maria Cöster, Björn Rosengren, Åke Carlsson, Fredrik Montgomery, Magnus Karlsson

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

302 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is need for structured evaluation of disability before and after surgery. The patients' subjective aspects of their symptoms should be one part of this evaluation, preferably captured by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). There are several PROMs, either generic or region-specific questionnaires, but no » gold standard « for foot or ankle evaluation. We translated the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) and evaluated the psychometric properties of the score in terms of reliability, validity and responsiveness in patients with a variety of foot and ankle disorders. In this report we recommend a validation process for PROMs and report that SEFAS shows good results when doing this. As SEFAS is a PROM, the instrument seems suitable for use in national registers.

Translated title of the contribution	Patient-reported SEFAS: Questionnaire good evaluation method in foot and ankle disorders
Original language	Swedish
Journal	Läkartidningen
Volume	112
Issue number	7
Publication status	Published - 2015

Subject classification (UKÄ)

Orthopaedics

Access to Document

LKT__Coster_et_al

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25668801?dopt=Abstract

Cite this

@article{b5331511aa294573a0e097283a88ff33,

title = "Patientrapporterade SEFAS: Fr{\aa}geformul{\"a}r bra utv{\"a}rderingsmetod vid fot- och fotledsbesv{\"a}r",

abstract = "There is need for structured evaluation of disability before and after surgery. The patients' subjective aspects of their symptoms should be one part of this evaluation, preferably captured by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). There are several PROMs, either generic or region-specific questionnaires, but no » gold standard « for foot or ankle evaluation. We translated the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) and evaluated the psychometric properties of the score in terms of reliability, validity and responsiveness in patients with a variety of foot and ankle disorders. In this report we recommend a validation process for PROMs and report that SEFAS shows good results when doing this. As SEFAS is a PROM, the instrument seems suitable for use in national registers.",

author = "Maria C{\"o}ster and Bj{\"o}rn Rosengren and {\AA}ke Carlsson and Fredrik Montgomery and Magnus Karlsson",

year = "2015",

language = "svenska",

volume = "112",

journal = "L{\"a}kartidningen",

issn = "0023-7205",

publisher = "Swedish Medical Association",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patientrapporterade SEFAS

T2 - Frågeformulär bra utvärderingsmetod vid fot- och fotledsbesvär

AU - Cöster, Maria

AU - Rosengren, Björn

AU - Carlsson, Åke

AU - Montgomery, Fredrik

AU - Karlsson, Magnus

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - There is need for structured evaluation of disability before and after surgery. The patients' subjective aspects of their symptoms should be one part of this evaluation, preferably captured by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). There are several PROMs, either generic or region-specific questionnaires, but no » gold standard « for foot or ankle evaluation. We translated the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) and evaluated the psychometric properties of the score in terms of reliability, validity and responsiveness in patients with a variety of foot and ankle disorders. In this report we recommend a validation process for PROMs and report that SEFAS shows good results when doing this. As SEFAS is a PROM, the instrument seems suitable for use in national registers.

AB - There is need for structured evaluation of disability before and after surgery. The patients' subjective aspects of their symptoms should be one part of this evaluation, preferably captured by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). There are several PROMs, either generic or region-specific questionnaires, but no » gold standard « for foot or ankle evaluation. We translated the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) and evaluated the psychometric properties of the score in terms of reliability, validity and responsiveness in patients with a variety of foot and ankle disorders. In this report we recommend a validation process for PROMs and report that SEFAS shows good results when doing this. As SEFAS is a PROM, the instrument seems suitable for use in national registers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953343188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

C2 - 25668801

SN - 0023-7205

VL - 112

JO - Läkartidningen

JF - Läkartidningen

IS - 7

ER -

Patientrapporterade SEFAS: Frågeformulär bra utvärderingsmetod vid fot- och fotledsbesvär

Abstract

Subject classification (UKÄ)

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this