Patients' perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative study

Alexander Holm, Hans Lindgren, Mats Bläckberg, Marika Augutis, Peter Jakobsson, Mattias Tell, Jonas Wallinder, Karl-Johan Lundström, Johan Styrke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: The aim was to describe the patients' experience of undergoing prostatic artery embolization.

Methods: A retrospective qualitative interview study was undertaken with 15 patients of mean age 73 years who had undergone prostatic artery embolization with a median duration of 210 min at two medium sized hospitals in Sweden. The reasons for conducting prostatic artery embolization were clean intermittent catheterization (n = 4), lower urinary tract symptoms (n = 10) or haematuria (n = 1). Data were collected through individual, semi-structured telephone interviews 1-12 months after treatment and analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Results: Four categories with sub-categories were formulated to describe the results: a diverse experience; ability to control the situation; resumption of everyday activities and range of opinions regarding efficacy of outcomes. Overall, the patients described the procedure as painless, easy and interesting and reported that while the procedure can be stressful, a calm atmosphere contributed to achieving a good experience. Limitations on access to reliable information before, during and after the procedure were highlighted as a major issue. Practical ideas for improving patient comfort during the procedure were suggested. Improved communications between treatment staff and patients were also highlighted. Most patients could resume everyday activities, some felt tired and bruising caused unnecessary worry for a few. Regarding functional outcome, some patients described substantial improvement in urine flow while others were satisfied with regaining undisturbed night sleep. Those with less effect were considering transurethral resection of the prostate as a future option. Self-enrolment to the treatment and long median operation time may have influenced the results.

Conclusions: From the patients' perspective, prostatic artery embolization is a well-tolerated method for treating benign prostate hyperplacia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
JournalSAGE Open Medicine
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patients' perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this