Pluralistic Ignorance : A Case for Social Epistemology and Epistemic Logic

Jens Ulrik Hansen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingPaper in conference proceedingpeer-review

Abstract

In this paper the phenomenon of pluralistic ignorance is discussed and it is argued why it is of relevance for epistemic logic and social psychology. Roughly put, pluralistic ignorance is the case when a group of interacting agents all experience a discrepancy between their private opinions and the perceived opinions of the others. After introducing the phenomenon, numerous features of pluralistic ignorance that are of interest for epistemic logic and social epistemology, are discussed. This discussion serves two purposes: It recaps the existing research on pluralistic ignorance within epistemic logic and social epistemology, while at the same time stating open problems for social epistemology and epistemic logic that pertains to the study of pluralistic ignorance. Finally, it is argued that the features of pluralistic ignorance of interest to epistemic logic and social epistemology relate to general features of information dynamics in situations of social interaction.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the workshop on Epistemic Logic for Individual, Social, and Interactive Epistemology (ELISIEM)
EditorsWes Holliday, Thomas Icard
Publication statusPublished - 2014
EventEpistemic Logic for Individual, Social, and Interactive Epistemology (ELISIEM 2014) - Tübingen, Germany
Duration: 2014 Aug 112014 Aug 15

Conference

ConferenceEpistemic Logic for Individual, Social, and Interactive Epistemology (ELISIEM 2014)
Country/TerritoryGermany
CityTübingen
Period2014/08/112014/08/15

Bibliographical note

https://sites.google.com/site/elisiem2014/home

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Philosophy

Free keywords

  • Pluralistic ignorance Epistemic logic Social epistemology Information dynamics Social interaction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pluralistic Ignorance : A Case for Social Epistemology and Epistemic Logic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this