Professions and the Pursuit of Transparency in Healthcare: Two Cases of Soft Autonomy

Charlotta Levay, Caroline Waks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Contemporary professions are increasingly challenged to open up to scrutiny from the outside. Earlier research is focused on two main types of responses and consequences: colonization by a managerial logic of self-monitoring and decoupling of auditing and professional practice. his paper describes a different type of response which implies that professionals get actively involved in monitoring their own activities, without losing their professional autonomy. Two cases from Swedish healthcare were investigated: accreditation at a hospital laboratory and the national quality registries. In both cases, professional involvement took the form of translation and negotiation in expert networks, restrained by a certain resistance towards external monitoring, but driven by an interest in legitimizing and developing professional work. he resulting situation is characterized as a 'soft autonomy' which combines professional internalization of originally non-professional auditing ideas with maintained professional control over evaluation criteria.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)509-527
JournalOrganization Studies
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Bibliographical note

The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015.
The record was previously connected to the following departments: The Vårdal Institute (016540000), Department of Business Administration (012003000)

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Business Administration

Free keywords

  • audit society
  • professions
  • soft autonomy
  • soft
  • bureaucracy
  • transparency
  • healthcare services
  • soft regulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Professions and the Pursuit of Transparency in Healthcare: Two Cases of Soft Autonomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this