Abstract
Contemporary professions are increasingly challenged to open up to scrutiny from the outside. Earlier research is focused on two main types of responses and consequences: colonization by a managerial logic of self-monitoring and decoupling of auditing and professional practice. his paper describes a different type of response which implies that professionals get actively involved in monitoring their own activities, without losing their professional autonomy. Two cases from Swedish healthcare were investigated: accreditation at a hospital laboratory and the national quality registries. In both cases, professional involvement took the form of translation and negotiation in expert networks, restrained by a certain resistance towards external monitoring, but driven by an interest in legitimizing and developing professional work. he resulting situation is characterized as a 'soft autonomy' which combines professional internalization of originally non-professional auditing ideas with maintained professional control over evaluation criteria.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 509-527 |
Journal | Organization Studies |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2009 |
Bibliographical note
The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015.The record was previously connected to the following departments: The Vårdal Institute (016540000), Department of Business Administration (012003000)
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Business Administration
Free keywords
- audit society
- professions
- soft autonomy
- soft
- bureaucracy
- transparency
- healthcare services
- soft regulation