Provocation in Philosophy and Art

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5032 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Provocation is an integral part of Socrates’ philosophical method. Does provocation have a similar methodological function in art? My tentative answer is no. In the Socratic method, provocation is used both on an individual level to force a person to think better (preferably in ethical matters) and on a general level in order to keep a society awake. A society should never rest but “be stirred into life.” Philosophy is a teleological practice with truth or enlightenment as its telos. Art has no well-defined telos, the place and use of provocation in art is therefore debatable. But for art to be something rather than anything, I argue that a provocative work of art has to provide for the aesthetic qualities of how the provocation is performed. Provocation without instrumental qualities is atypical in philosophy, whereas provocation without intrinsic qualities is atypical in art. Using this as a normative guide, we may claim that instrumental success is more important than intrinsic success in philosophy and that the opposite holds for art, as far as provocation is concerned. I conclude by commenting on two Swedish examples of provocation in art from this perspective.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-35
JournalThe International Journal of Social, Political, and Community Agendas in the Arts
Volume10
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Philosophy

Free keywords

  • Provocation
  • Socratic Method
  • Art

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Provocation in Philosophy and Art'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this