Objectives: Reports on quality-of-life (QoL) after bile duct injury (BDI) show conflicting results. The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate QoL stratified according to type of treatment. Methods: QoL assessment using the SF-36 (36-item short form health survey) questionnaire. Patients with post-cholecystectomy BDI needing hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) were compared to all other treatments (BDI repair) and to patients without BDI at cholecystectomy (controls). Results: Patients needing a HJ after BDI reported reduced long-term QoL irrespective of time for diagnosis and repair in both the physical (PCS; p <.001) and mental (MCS; p <.001) domain compared to both controls and patients with less severe BDI. QoL was comparable for BDI repair (n = 86) and controls (n = 192) in both PCS (p =.171) and MCS (p =.654). As a group, patients with BDI (n = 155) reported worse QoL than controls, in both the PCS (p <.001) and MCS (p =.012). Patients with a BDI detected intraoperatively (n = 124) reported better QoL than patients with a postoperative diagnosis. Patients with an immediate intraoperative repair (n = 99), including HJ, reported a better long-term QoL compared to patients subjected to a later procedure (n = 54). Conclusions: Patients with postoperative diagnosis and patients with BDIs needing biliary reconstruction with HJ both reported reduced long-term QoL.
|Number of pages||6|
|Journal||Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology|
|Early online date||2020 Jul 31|
|Publication status||Published - 2020|
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
- bile duct injury