Qu’est-ce qu’on fait de ce qui dépasse? Réflexions sur le classement générique de la matière orale

Translated title of the contribution: What to do when it doesn’t fit? : Reflections on generic classification in oral material

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this article, in the light of the important epistemological changes in human sciences since the 80’s, which had the merit of clarifying the foundations of modern scientific nature, we focus on the difficulties in classifying the orally transmitted material. We show, that the question is not so much what we talk about, when we talk about genres, but how we talk about it. We demonstrate that the disagreements among researchers often emerge due to different ways of using the terminologies on the material, rather than different ways of actually apprehending the genres. The path to consensus might be situated in between essentialism and nominalism.
Translated title of the contributionWhat to do when it doesn’t fit? : Reflections on generic classification in oral material
Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)23-35
Number of pages13
JournalSynergies Pays Scandinaves
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Studies of Specific Literatures (including Literature from specific Language areas)
  • Studies of Specific Languages

Free keywords

  • genre
  • classification
  • oral material
  • epistemology
  • terminology
  • medieval literature

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What to do when it doesn’t fit? : Reflections on generic classification in oral material'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this