Reflective Inclusion: Learning from Activists What Taking a Deliberative Stance Means

Andrea Felicetti, Markus Holdo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Researchers are increasingly recognizing that social movements are crucial for realizing deliberative democratic values. However, this raises two important questions: (1) what actions should count as deliberation and (2) whether we should demand more from activists than merely provoking or encouraging deliberation in a society. Building on current research on activists’ actual engagement with deliberation, we argue that the standard of taking a “deliberative stance” (being respectful, sincere, and public-minded) is a good starting point for addressing both questions. By taking a deliberative stance, movements benefit from deliberation themselves and contribute to deliberative systems. However, we should also acknowledge that forms of deliberation change, and discovering new forms is a crucial part of what movements do for democracy. We propose to adopt a principle we call “reflective inclusion,” which allows us to engage abductively with new actions that might expand and deepen our understanding of what deliberation may look like.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)823-841
JournalPolitical Studies
Volume72
Issue number2
Early online date2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Political Science

Free keywords

  • activism
  • deliberation
  • democracy
  • participation
  • social movements

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reflective Inclusion: Learning from Activists What Taking a Deliberative Stance Means'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this