Relative Deprivation and Sickness Absence in Sweden

Jonas Helgertz, Wolfgang Hess, Kirk Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: A high prevalence of sickness absence in many countries, at a substantial societal cost, underlines the importance to understand its determining mechanisms. This study focuses on the link between relative deprivation and the probability of sickness absence. Methods: 184,000 men and women in Sweden were followed between 1982 and 2001. The sample consists of working individuals between the ages of 19 and 65. The outcome is defined as experiencing more than 14 days of sickness absence during a year. Based on the complete Swedish population, an individual’s degree of relative deprivation is measured through income compared to individuals of the same age, sex, educational level and type. In accounting for the possibility that sickness absence and socioeconomic status are determined by common factors, discrete-time duration models were estimated, accounting for unobserved heterogeneity through random effects. Results: The results confirm that the failure to account for the dynamics of the individual’s career biases the influence from socioeconomic characteristics. Results consistently suggest a major influence from relative deprivation, with a consistently lower risk of sickness absence among the highly educated. Conclusions: Altering individual’s health behavior through education appears more efficient in reducing the reliance on sickness absence, rather than redistributive policies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3930-3953
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume10
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Environmental Health and Occupational Health

Free keywords

  • duration analysis
  • sickness absence
  • Sweden
  • relative deprivation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relative Deprivation and Sickness Absence in Sweden'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this